Archive for July, 2010

“My child doesn’t have a brain injury, he only has a concussion”.

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

.

MSc, McMaster University, School of Rehabilitation Science, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Room 433, 1400 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 1C7. dematteo@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The term “concussion” is frequently used in clinical records to describe a traumatic head injury; however, there are no standard definitions of this term, particularly in how it is used with children. The goals of this study were to examine the clinical correlates of the concussion diagnosis and to identify the factors that lead to the use of this term in a regional pediatric center.

METHODS: Medical data were prospectively collected from 434 children with traumatic brain injury who were admitted to a Canadian children’s hospital. A proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association of the concussion diagnosis and the times until discharge and school return. A classification-tree analysis modeled the clinical correlates of patients who received a concussion diagnosis. RESULTS: The concussion label was significantly more likely to be applied to children with mild Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13 to 15 (P = .03). The concussion label was strongly predictive of earlier hospital discharge (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-1.9; P = .003) and earlier return to school (OR: 2.4 [95% CI: 1.6-3.7]; P < .001). A diagnosis of a concussion was significantly more likely when the computed-tomography results were normal and the child had lost consciousness.

CONCLUSIONS: Children with mild traumatic brain injuries have an increased frequency of receiving the concussion label, although the label may also be applied to children with more-severe injuries. The concussion diagnosis is associated with important clinical outcomes. It’s typical use in hospital settings likely refers to an impact-related mild brain injury, in the absence of indicators other than a loss of consciousness. Clinicians may use the concussion label because it is less alarming to parents than the term mild brain injury, with the intent of implying that the injury is transient with no significant long-term health consequences.

PMID: 20083526 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Dematteo CA, Hanna SE, Mahoney WJ, Hollenberg RD, Scott LA, Law MC, Newman A, Lin CY, Xu L.

Music Therapy Shown To Aid in Stroke Patient Recovery

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

.

Philadelphia, PA, United States (AHN) – A review of several studies finds that music therapy provided by trained music therapists may help to improve movement in stroke patients. In addition some trials conducted on the topic suggest music can play a larger role in recovery from brain injury.

Strokes affect more than 20 million people a year and many patients suffer from brain injuries that damage their movement and language abilities resulting in significant loss of quality of life. Music therapists are specially trained in techniques that stimulate brain functions targeted to improve outcomes for sufferers of debilitating brain injuries.

One common technique is rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS), which relies on the connections between rhythm and movement. Music of a particular tempo is used to stimulate movement in the patient.

Seven small studies involving 184 people were included in the new Cochrane Systematic Review.

RAS therapy was shown to improve walking speed greater than standard movement therapy, and helped patients take longer steps. In one trial, RAS also improved arm movements, as measured by elbow extension angle.

Source: AHN News Editor Ayinde O. Chase

Vancouver B.C. back in the news…Disabled woman pushed to the ground, what happened?

Saturday, July 24th, 2010

.A disabled woman seen on a surveillance video being pushed to the ground by Vancouver police says she did not provoke the officer who shoved her.

The video was taken at the beginning of July on the sidewalk on Hastings Street, near the crowded United We Can recycling centre. Sandy, who did not want her last name to be used, said she was just trying to get past the officer and two others with whom he was walking.

“I was walking home and I reached my hand up because I was trying to get through … but the tall guy pushed me down because they thought I was grabbing their gun because I touched the belt,” she said. Video taken down - The complete video of the incident was posted online by the B.C. Civil Liberties Association on Thursday. But on Friday morning the video was deleted from the Vimeo video-hosting website. The BCCLA was uncertain why or how the video was removed. The full video was then posted to YouTube on Friday afternoon.

 “He pushed me on the shoulder and pulled me down on the floor.” Sandy, who has cerebral palsy, said she asked the officers repeatedly to let her through. “But they were not giving me any [room] to walk. I asked them, ‘Excuse me, please,’ and I told them three times that I have a disability … and after I fell they walked away like nothing happened.” The officers just left her there, Sandy said, while several bystanders stepped in to help her to her feet.

Sandy said the Vancouver Police Department wrote her an apology letter, but she believes more should be done.

“He has no right to do that at all.… People of authority just disrespecting me like this, or anybody at all, it should be no excuse. Everybody should be treated equally.”

The police publicly apologized for the incident and an internal investigation was underway, Vancouver Police spokeswoman Const. Jana McGuinness said on Thursday. “The officer involved did take immediate steps that day to report the incident to his supervisor. Within hours the duty officer was informed and the information was passed on to the professional standards section, initiating an investigation, and the officer has apologized to the woman, expressing his regret for his initial action and for not helping in the aftermath,” McGuinness said.

‘Horrified but not surprised’

The incident happened in Vancouver’s troubled Downtown Eastside, an area plagued with homelessness and drug addiction. Those who live and work in the area say incidents like this one are too common. “I have to say, of all the communities I’ve lived in, the Lower Mainland … the Downtown Eastside is one of the most marginalized,” said Tami Starlight, with the Downtown Eastside Neighborhood Council. “A lot of stuff goes on down here that wouldn’t be allowed or tolerated anywhere else by the police.” Starlight said she was shocked and angry when she first saw the video, as were many members of the community. “A lot of people are outraged in the community, really, as they should be.”

Wendy Pedersen, with the Carnegie Community Action Committee, said she was not shocked by what she saw on the video. “I was horrified but not surprised because I’ve seen it before, with my own eyes.” Pedersen said such incidents are a regular occurrence in the Downtown Eastside.

“I’m … just disgusted and I’m getting angry that this is happening to people,” she said. “If it wasn’t for the camera, Sandy would have just let it go, and the police officer knew she would have done that, and that’s why he did it.”

Pedersen said the video is a clear sign changes are needed to the way the Downtown Eastside is policed.

“The police in this neighborhood need to be specially trained and they need to be special people,” Pedersen said. “And they need to know how to deal with conflict and their own anger really well, and they also have to be educated about dealing with stereotypes and discrimination.” The B.C. Civil Liberties Association said Thursday that Sandy had MS, but Sandy told CBC News she has cerebral palsy.

Source:  CBCNews  23 July 2010


Do you feel that Canadian Police Forces adequately trained officers to recognize and work with individuals with potential mental health challenges or even such an invisible injury as, a brain injury?

Does Vancouverites still have the images of Robert Dziekanski sketched into their minds?  


Vancouver B.C. in the news - Brain Injury

Saturday, July 24th, 2010

.

Court hears attacker said pub patron ‘deserved’ devastating sucker-punch.


An unprovoked assault on Ritch Dowrey left the 62-year-old father with a “catastrophic” brain injury that means he will need lifelong assistance, Vancouver Provincial Court heard Wednesday morning. Vancouver resident Shawn Woodward has been accused of aggravated assault for hitting Dowrey on March 13, 2009, at the Fountainhead Pub on Davie Street in Vancouver’s West End.

 

The accused allegedly told witnesses that he sucker-punched Dowrey because “he’s a faggot — he deserved it.” Dowrey, the father of two grown children and well-known in football circles as a huge B.C. Lions fan, now lives at the Connect care home in Langley.  In her opening statement, Crown Counsel Jacinta Lawton painted a picture of devastating consequences from that evening’s assault.

 

Dowrey will never be able to live independently again as a result of the brain injury, and requires assistance with daily activities such as feeding and dressing, said Lawton, citing uncontested medical reports. He also needs a walker to walk and a wheelchair to go further distances, and requires verbal prompting for every action, except eating, she said.

 

Dowrey has no memory of the assault and as such, will not be testifying to that evening’s events. He is able to recognize his family members, many of whom packed the courtroom Wednesday, including his daughter and brother. Dowrey was not present.

 

Lawton said there is no dispute over the identity of the accused, the date, time and location of the incident and the fact that Woodward applied force to Dowrey. What is at issue are the events leading up to the blow and whether Woodward acted in self defence, she said.

 

Woodward, 35 at the time of arrest last year, appeared in court neatly dressed in a black dress shirt and dress pants. The first Crown witness to be called to the stand, Fountainhead Pub waitress, Kristi McNicholl, testified that Dowrey was a regular at the bar. That night, McNicholl said she saw Dowrey by the pool table and was about to take a shot when Woodward, who was standing on the other side of the table, walked over and punched Dowrey in the jaw and cheek, the court heard. She testified that no words were exchanged between the two men prior to the punch.

 

McNicholl said she immediately knew that Dowrey was rendered unconscious because he dropped his cue and fell straight backwards. “It was dead weight falling,” McNicholl said in court. “I heard the back of Ritchie’s head hit the tile [floor] at the front entrance. It was loud, it was like a pop.” McNicholl, 23, testified that she then saw Woodward step over Dowrey’s body and calmly walk out the front door of the pub.

 

Lawton said medical reports showed the blow led to a fractured skull and bleeding in Dowrey’s brain. Lindsay Wincherauk, 50, an acquaintance of Dowrey’s and fellow regular at the Fountainhead Pub, testified Wednesday that he too saw Woodward knock Dowrey down with a single punch. Wincherauk said he then followed the accused outside, confronted Woodward on Davie Street and asked him “why he did it.” “[Woodward] said, ‘He’s a faggot, he deserved it. The faggot touched me, I’m not a faggot,’” Wincherauk testified.

 

Scott Larin, head bartender at the Fountainhead pub, told the court he was with Wincherauk at the time of the confrontation. Larin gave similar testimony to Wincherauk’s, recounting that when Woodward was asked “why he did it,” he responded by saying “[Dowrey] deserved it.”

 

Larin told the court that the Fountainhead Pub is known as a neighbourhood joint where everyone’s welcome — “gay or straight.” The majority of its patrons on Fridays are members of the gay, lesbian and transgender community, he said. At the time, the assault infuriated Vancouver’s gay community, who viewed it as a hate crime. That designation has not been proven in court.

 

Lawton said a hate-crime designation is only considered at the time of sentencing — if there is a conviction.

If a case is considered a hate crime, the judge would take that as an aggravating factor in handing out the sentence.

 

Source: Lena Sin, The Province 22 July 2010

Ecstasy & P.T.S.D. ?

Monday, July 19th, 2010

Ecstasy “may help stress sufferers”. Ecstasy can help the tortured victims of post-traumatic stress overcome their demons, research has shown.

 

In tests, the illegal dance drug had a dramatic effect on previously-untreatable patients who had suffered post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for more than 19 years. Doctors in the US held two eight-hour psychotherapy sessions three to five weeks apart for the patients, during which they administered the Ecstasy chemical MDMA. Two months later, 80% of those treated no longer had symptoms that met the medical definition of PTSD.

 

Ten of the 12 patients given Ecstasy responded to the treatment, said the researchers led by Dr Rick Doblin, president of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies in Santa Cruz, California.

 

In contrast, just two out of eight patients offered a “dummy” placebo showed an improvement.

Three individuals so badly affected by their condition that they could not hold down a job were able to return to work.

 

The scientists have now had the go-ahead from the US regulatory body, the Food and Drug Administration, to carry out a bigger study of US war veterans. It will look at the effect of different doses of MDMA on ex-soldiers traumatised by their experiences in Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam.

 

Writing in the Journal of Psychopharmacology, the scientists said: “Patients with PTSD are prone to extremes of emotional numbing or extreme anxiety, and often have a narrow window between thresholds of under and over-arousal.

 

“MDMA may exert its therapeutic effect by widening this window. If MDMA allows patients to stay emotionally engaged without being overwhelmed by anxiety while revisiting traumatic experiences, it may thereby catalyse effective exposure therapy.”

 

 

 

Source: Press Association – UK July 19, 2010

Assault, Abuse and Brain Injury

Friday, July 16th, 2010

Assault, Abuse and Brain Injury

A brain injury does not happen to one type of person or any specific group or set of individuals. A brain can happen to anyone, anytime. Whether you are carefully driving home one night and are hit by a drunk driver, or you stepped off the sidewalk on a green light and were suddenly hit. A brain injury is every ones concerns, not simply a concern for a select few – BRAININJURYFORUM.com

United Kingdom - Abuse Carlisle man jailed for leaving wife with brain injury. A Carlisle man who badly beat his wife leaving her with serious brain injuries has been jailed for three years.

 

Carlisle Crown Court heard how Sean McDonald repeatedly attacked his wife Lillian at their home in Morton Street. The 40-year-old, who has 97 previous convictions, admitted three charges of assault and two of assaulting a police officer on 5 June.

 

The hearing was told how Mrs McDonald spent four days in hospital being treated for blood clots on the brain. She later told police her husband had been “violent since the day they were married”.

The court heard that McDonald already had a string of convictions, including several for violence.

 

Source: BBC News - 6 July 2010

Drug use can trigger psychosis in vulnerable people, experts say

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

.

Marijuana can send a brain to pot

At age 17, sitting in the basement with friends smoking pot, Don Corbeil first noticed all the cameras spying on him. Then he became convinced a radioactive chip had been planted in his head. “I thought I was being monitored like a lab rat,” he explains.

It never occurred to him that marijuana could be messing with his brain. Corbeil had been smoking pot since he was 14, a habit that escalated to about 10 joints a day. He started hearing voices and, at one point, Corbeil thought he was the Messiah. Police found him one day talking incoherently, and brought him to hospital, where he was eventually diagnosed with drug-induced psychosis.

Corbeil had dabbled in other drugs, such as acid and ecstasy. But marijuana was his mainstay. When he went on anti-psychotic medication and off pot, the symptoms eventually stopped. But twice he tried smoking it again, and both times the demons sprung up. “Within 10 minutes, the voices started,” says Corbeil, now 20, of North Bay. “It was as if people had been in a box for a few years and then you take the lid off and they all want to talk to you.”

He slammed the lid back on the box — he swore off marijuana. With good reason: Research in recent years has shown that marijuana can trigger psychosis in vulnerable individuals. But who exactly is at risk remains hazy. Smoking marijuana is one of a messy mix of circumstances genetics, stress, injury, age of first use that likely predispose someone to psychosis.

“There seems to be a combination of risk factors. But nobody knows which combinations can be the triggers.” says Jean Addington, psychiatry professor at the University of Calgary and president of the International Early Psychosis Association.

Some studies suggest that youth in their early teens who become regular users toking a few times a week have double the risk five years later of paranoia, hallucinations and psychotic breaks. While most studies have focused on cannabis and psychosis, researchers are also investigating the relationship between marijuana and other mental illnesses.

In a survey of more than 14,000 Ontarians, Robert Mann, senior scientist at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health found that people who use cannabis almost every day were twice as likely to have anxiety or mood disorders as non-users. The study, however, did not determine whether the drug prompted symptoms or was used to self-medicate.

And a McGill University study on rats last year found that injecting adolescents daily with small doses of synthetic marijuana led to depression-like and anxiety-like behaviours in a series of tests. Researchers also found that rats’ brains were altered long-term.

“We finally understand that marijuana is not the harmless substance we thought it was,” says Dr. Leonardo Cortese, chief of psychiatry at Windsor Regional Hospital. No one is talking about the return of Reefer Madness, the 1930s film about cannabis use leading to death and destruction. The vast majority of pot smokers will not go psychotic.

But two recent developments have researchers particularly bummed about pot.

Imaging studies now show that crucial regions of the brain are still developing in the teen years, the very time many start smoking pot. After alcohol, marijuana is the teen drug of choice. More than 30 per cent of Ontario’s Grade 10 students reported cannabis use in the past year, according to CAMH.

And what they’re smoking is not their hippie dad’s doobie. Growers have bred more potent pot, more than doubling the amounts of Tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive ingredient, and decreasing the cannabidiol, a protective ingredient.

About 3 per cent of the population will experience a psychotic episode from all causes. The rate, however, of cannabis-induced psychotic episodes is not clear. “We’re just catching up to the effects of high-octane weed,” says Dr. James Kennedy, director of the neuroscience research department at CAMH. “We need new follow-up studies to see its effect on the population.”

While psychosis is rare, for the kid hearing voices, it is life-altering. Some are lucky and the symptoms stop when the drugs stop, but for many, the voices and hallucinations recur.

Social stresses such as family problems and emotional trauma contribute to the risk of psychosis, as do some biological factors, such as brain injury, says Addington. A family history of serious, persistent mental illness, particularly psychosis, ratchets up the risk too, but the genetic markers are by no means clear cut.

Many genes may predispose someone to psychosis. Focus has been on a variant of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene, which is associated with higher levels of dopamine in the brain.

Dopamine, an important neurotransmitter, is involved in thinking processes, mood, memory and reward-seeking behaviour. Too much dopamine can create confused thoughts, paranoid delusions and other psychotic symptoms, explains Kennedy.

Since smoking marijuana increases dopamine levels, people carrying that variant COMT gene who use weed could experience levels high enough to tip them into a danger zone.

Especially if it’s particularly potent pot. It’s THC, the psychoactive ingredient, that pushes up the dopamine.

In the 1980s, the THC level in marijuana was about 3 to 4 per cent. In the last couple of years, says Det. Don Theriault of the Toronto Police, tests on marijuana show a 10 to 12 per cent THC level.

An estimated 20 per cent of Caucasians carry that COMT variant. That does not neatly translate into a one-in-five risk, however. “They could have several other genes that are protective. It gets complicated,” says Kennedy.

So what percentage is at risk of psychosis from marijuana? Kennedy hesitates. This is not solid scientific ground. “I’d guess 10 to 15 per cent would be at significant risk if they smoked a lot of marijuana, almost daily, in their teen years when the brain isn’t fully developed.”

It’s the brains front part, crucial in judgement and social perceptions that’s still under construction in the teen years. “The wiring, the circuits where the neurotransmitters flow and signal are still being laid down,” says Kennedy.

So does smoking pot permanently change or damage this still-maturing brain?

We’ll have that answer in two or three years, says Kennedy. Imaging studies tracking the growth of teens’ brains are looking at whether cannabis use alters the development, or permanently damages still-maturing brains.

It’s not only teens that may be vulnerable, however. Ana Smith didn’t use marijuana regularly until her mid-20s, after she graduated from film school. “I’d stay home in the evenings with my cats, make tea and smoke weed,” says Smith, a Vancouver resident, now 39. Then she started smoking during the day as well, first thing in the morning and through the afternoon, instead of writing screenplays. The only time she didn’t smoke was weekends, when she worked in a group home. She didn’t drink or do other drugs. At first the voices in her head were pleasant. “They tricked me into thinking I was being discovered by Hollywood. It was a beautiful world for a couple of months.” Then they turned evil, terrifying her. Smith spent four lost days just walking, sleeping on the streets. She finally checked herself into a hospital and was diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic.

Smith has no known family history of mental illness. But a geneticist told her she had inherited genetic frailties from both her parents. Smith had also been under a lot of stress. “I think pot tipped me over the edge.” After the diagnosis, Smith kept smoking pot because the voices demanded it. She stopped two years ago and her mental health has improved. “Now I know it’s just the illness rearing its head,” she says.

Research suggests that only about 15 per cent of people who experience a first psychotic episode do not have another, says Dr. Suzanne Archie, clinical director of the Cleghorn Early Intervention in Psychosis Centre in Hamilton. For a large portion of that 15 per cent, the episode was probably due to drugs.

“It can be very tricky to figure out if it was substance-induced or if there’s an underlying psychiatric illness,” says Archie. If the patient is off drugs for six months with no psychotic symptoms, Archie leans toward a substance-induced diagnosis. But for the majority, those diagnosed with a psychotic illness, the big question is:

Could it have been prevented if the cannabis had been avoided? That’s impossible to know, researchers say.

“The marijuana could cause schizophrenia to come on sooner,” says Kennedy. “If it interacts with a not fully-developed brain it could create a more severe, a more disruptive version of schizophrenia.”

With schizophrenia, marijuana likely precedes psychosis, although some people may smoke to ward off early symptoms. With depression and anxiety, clinicians face a chicken-and-egg dilemma: Did the pot help spark the symptoms, or was it used as an attempt to self-medicate?

“These cases are difficult to tease apart,” says Dr. Benjamin Goldstein, adolescent psychiatrist at Sunnybrook Hospital. He advises anyone feeling anxious or depressed to stay away from weed. “The effects of pot on them swing more steeply toward the risk end.”

Source: thestar.com - Nancy J. White Living Reporter - July 1010

In Youth Hockey, ‘Checking’ Ups Risk Of Brain Injury

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

All contact sports introduce the risk of injury. But researchers say there’s one move in hockey that can be mighty dangerous for young players: the body check. A new study finds 11-year-olds who played in a league that allows checking — using your body to block another player — are more than three times as likely to suffer concussions and serious injuries compared with kids who played in a league that bans checking.

 

Carolyn Emery of the University of Calgary, one of the researchers who conducted the study, said that if body checking were banned in her province — Alberta, Canada — “we’d expect to see 1,000 fewer injuries and about 400 fewer concussions.” In the study, which was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Emery compared injury rates among hockey players in Alberta to those in Quebec, where checking is banned.

 

Typically many hockey leagues in the United States and Canada introduce checking at age 11. “But I think these findings are strong evidence to support the notion that perhaps the age at which body checking is introduced should be reconsidered,” says Emery.  The American Academy of Paediatrics agrees. The group recommends limiting the practice of checking for all players younger than 15. The policy was drafted in 2007 after a report that concluded body checking accounts for 86 percent of all injuries that occurred during games played by 9 to 15-year-olds!

 

Top hockey leaders didn’t seem to give much credence to the AAP recommendation. “We thought there wasn’t enough data there,” says Kevin McLaughlin, senior director of hockey development for USA Hockey, the national governing body for youth and adult hockey leagues that establishes the play rules. McLaughlin says the new study published in JAMA adds more to the debate. “I think this new information will definitely play a factor with our board of directors and our district representatives.” The study has generated a lot of discussion about the right age to introduce body checking. There’s also recognition that body size makes a difference. Studies show that smaller, lighter kids are at significantly higher risk than bigger players.

 

The Power of a Body Check

In order to understand the power of a body check, look no farther than NHL replays. During a playoff game several years ago, Philadelphia Flyers player R.J. Umberger was slammed by Buffalo Sabres player Brian Campbell.  Campbell just destroyed Umberger,” one of the announcers boomed. In the stadium, the fans went wild, and on the ice a brawl ensued. Umberger looked up from the ice with a woozy look. “It’s a dramatic hit, and he looks like he got a concussion,” explains concussion prevention researcher Barry Willer of the University of Buffalo, after watching the incident on YouTube.

 

Learning to Check Correctly

But Willer says despite these dramatic plays, the body check is integral to the sport. During competitive collegiate and professional games there can be dozens of body checks where no one gets hurt. But this takes skill. And it takes young players time to develop the skill. “So when should the youngster learn to body check and more importantly to take a check?” asks Willer. “That’s the controversial issue.” Willer says he’s not convinced that waiting to the age of 15 to introduce full body checking is the best solution. He explains there’s a steep learning curve. And he says no matter when the move is introduced, injury rates will probably go up as players adjust to using it. Willer’s advice is to limit checking in all recreational leagues, and leave these intentional slams to the competitive players who are aiming to make a collegiate or professional career out of it.

Safety as the Bottom Line

The earliest that USA Hockey would consider any policy changes is next summer. In the interim, the group says it will to continue to focus on educating coaches on the best ways to help players develop proper checking skills and prevent injuries.

“Our No. 1 priority is the safety of the youth athlete” says McLaughlin. “We don’t want anyone getting hurt playing the game.”

Source: NPR News June 13, 2010

NFL & T.B.I. in Professional Football: An Evidence-Base Perspective

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

.

Experts from Johns Hopkins Medicine hosted a press conference following a continuing medical education program on the epidemiology of  head injury in professional football. This program was an evidence-based review of traumatic brain injury in the sport.

The objectives of the conference on Traumatic Brain Injury in Professional Football: An Evidence-Base Perspective was to assess the current scientific knowledge on this subject and to make recommendations for the future research needed to answer the remaining questions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Among the major recommendations for the future mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) biomarkers research agenda were:

 

The NFL commissioner talks with the Pentagon Channel at Johns Hopkins conference on brain injuries in sports and military personnel.

  • Conduct prospective longitudinal studies evaluating the value of clinical tests, serum biomarkers, imaging, and electrophysiological tests in a) differentiating players with and without traumatic brain damage, b) detecting the effect of preventive/therapeutic interventions, and c) predicting long-term cognitive and behavioral outcomes.
  • The need for MRI and PET studies to determine in vivo morphological and functional correlates of physical impacts, concussions and long-term post-TBI cognitive decline.
  • The need to implement MRI and electrophysiology studies to identify mechanisms of neural plasticity following MTBI.

For the area of long-term neuropsychiatric outcomes after TBI, the following research agenda was recommended:

  • A study of former players, with state-of-the-art measures, to determine:
    -  Rates of neuropsychiatric disorders by age
    -  The relationship between neuropsychiatric disorders and cumulative exposure to sub-concussive or concussive impacts sustained across the player’s career.
  • Design and start a cohort study of retiring players for the same purpose.

Research recommendations for chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) include:

  • Additional study of CTE pathology and neurobiology.
  • Development of biomarkers to detect CTE in vivo among former players and other athletes.
  • Development of animal models to test the hypothesis that repeat injury leads to degenerative tauopathy and to identify mechanisms that can be targets for intervention.

Recommendations for mitigating the consequences of TBI in football include:

  • Development of a longitudinal concussion and “hits” database to capture prior and present episodes, quantify symptoms, document evaluations for return to play and document rehabilitation strategies.

Press Conference T.B.I. in Professional Football: An Evidence-Base Perspective

http://webcast.jhu.edu/mediasite/Viewer/?peid=3e43e3b9752446d7b469efd59133c834

Date: June 2010

Low Risk of Traumatic Brain Injury from Roller Coaster Rides, Researcher Says

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

.

With July 4th behind us, one question was raised. It is the potential feared head injury from a roller coaster ride; it’s time to stop worrying and enjoy your local amusement parks. Although a significant body of scientific research has long contended that the physics behind gravitational force isn’t enough to cause problems, misconceptions have abounded anyway, said Bryan Pfister, PhD, an assistant professor in the department of biomedical engineering at NJIT.

Source: www.physorg.com June 2010